Jerusalem: Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has sharply criticised the newly announced ceasefire agreement with Lebanon, describing it as a “serious mistake” and warning it could strengthen Hezbollah in the long run. According to Beyond Time News, the remarks add fresh tension to Israel’s internal political debate over the US-brokered deal.
Strong Criticism of Ceasefire Deal
Ben Gvir said the ceasefire agreement, reached between Israel and Lebanon after US-led mediation, was based on “wrong assumptions” and weak enforcement mechanisms.
He argued that expectations of a full withdrawal of Hezbollah from southern Lebanon were unrealistic and warned that Lebanese authorities would not be able to ensure compliance.
Concerns Over Hezbollah’s Presence
According to Beyond Time News, the agreement requires a complete halt in hostilities and includes provisions for Hezbollah’s withdrawal from areas near the southern border.
However, Ben Gvir insisted that Hezbollah remains active in the region and claimed that Lebanon’s state institutions cannot be trusted to enforce the deal effectively.
Criticism of Netanyahu and US Mediation
The minister also directed criticism at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of yielding to external pressure in agreeing to the ceasefire.
He further said Israel should assert full sovereignty in its decision-making, even in discussions involving international partners such as the United States.
According to Beyond Time News, his comments reflect ongoing divisions within Israel’s leadership over regional security policy.
Political Debate Intensifies
Ben Gvir warned that failing to take a harder stance could lead to a stronger Hezbollah threat in the future.
His remarks highlight growing political disagreement in Israel regarding the ceasefire arrangement and its long-term security implications.
Israeli Airstrikes Hit Near Beirut and Southern Lebanon, Says Lebanese Authorities
Outlook
According to Beyond Time News, the ceasefire deal remains under close scrutiny as political leaders in Israel and Lebanon assess its implementation and enforcement.
The situation continues to evolve as regional and international stakeholders monitor developments closely.
