SRINAGAR: A minister in the Omar Abdullah-led government in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir has raised concerns over the demolition of homes and seizure of properties during ongoing anti-drug operations.
According to Beyond Time News, the remarks came amid increasing enforcement actions linked to drug-related cases in the region.
Minister Questions Selective Action
Health and Education Minister Sakina Itoo said that enforcement actions appear to be disproportionately affecting the Kashmir Valley.
She pointed out that drug abuse exists in multiple regions but argued that punitive measures are being applied more aggressively in Kashmir.
She also questioned the demolition of homes and confiscation of properties, suggesting that such actions raise legal and humanitarian concerns.
Ongoing Anti-Drug Enforcement
The regional administration has intensified its crackdown on drug-related activities in recent months. Authorities say the campaign targets illegal drug networks and traffickers.
However, critics argue that the enforcement measures are broad and may affect families of accused individuals.
Read more:IIOJK High Court Upholds PSA Detention of Kashmiri Youth
Concerns Over Impact on Families
Minister Itoo stressed that the focus should remain on tackling drug abuse and supporting rehabilitation efforts. She said punitive actions against entire families may create additional social and economic hardship.
Her remarks come as enforcement agencies continue operations under existing drug control laws in the region.
Debate Over Enforcement Approach
The anti-drug campaign has triggered debate among political figures and civil society groups. Some support strict action against trafficking networks, while others call for a more balanced approach focused on prevention and treatment.
Officials maintain that the objective of the campaign is to reduce drug abuse and protect youth from addiction.
Broader Discussion on Policy Direction
The issue has added to ongoing discussions about governance and law enforcement practices in the region.
Observers say the debate reflects wider concerns about how anti-drug policies are implemented and their impact on local communities.
